05 Eastside Mixed Conifer Forest
Rex C. Crawford
Geographic Distribution. The Eastside Mixed Conifer Forest
habitat appears primarily in the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and Okanogan
Highland Ecoregions of Oregon, Washington, adjacent Idaho, and western Montana.
It also extends north into British Columbia. Douglas-fir-ponderosa pine
forests occur along the eastern slope of the Oregon and Washington Cascades, the
Blue Mountains, and the Okanogan Highlands of Washington. Grand fir-Douglas-fir
forests and western larch forests are widely distributed throughout the Blue
Mountains and, less so, along the east slope of the Cascades south of Lake
Chelan and in the eastern Okanogan Highlands. Western hemlock-western
redcedar-Douglas-fir forests are found in the Selkirk Mountains of eastern
Washington, and on the east slope of the Cascades south of Lake Chelan to the
Columbia River Gorge.
Physical Setting. The Eastside Mixed Conifer Forest habitat
is primarily mid-montane with an elevation range of between 1,000
and 7,000 ft (305-2,137 m), mostly between 3,000 and 5,500 ft (914-1,676
m). Parent materials for soil development vary. This habitat receives
some of the greatest amounts of precipitation in the inland northwest,
30-80 inches (76-203 cm)/year. Elevation of this habitat varies
geographically, with generally higher elevations to the east.
Landscape Setting. This habitat makes up most of the continuous
montane forests of the inland Pacific Northwest. It is located between
the subalpine portions of the Montane Mixed Conifer Forest habitat
in eastern Oregon and Washington and lower tree line Ponderosa Pine
and Forest and Woodlands.
Back to Top
Structure. Eastside Mixed Conifer habitats are montane
forests and woodlands. Stand canopy structure is generally diverse,
although single-layer forest canopies are currently more common
than multilayered forests with snags and large woody debris. The
tree layer varies from closed forests to more open-canopy forests
or woodlands. This habitat may include very open stands. The undergrowth
is complex and diverse. Tall shrubs, low shrubs, forbs or any combination
may dominate stands. Deciduous shrubs typify shrub layers. Prolonged
canopy closure may lead to development of a sparsely vegetated undergrowth.
Composition. This habitat contains a wide array of tree
species (nine) and stand dominance patterns. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii) is the most common tree species in this habitat.
It is almost always present and dominates or co-dominates most overstories.
Lower elevations or drier sites may have ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa) as a co- dominant with Douglas-fir in the overstory
and often have other shade-tolerant tree species growing in the
undergrowth. On moist sites, grand fir (Abies grandis), western
redcedar (Thuja plicata) and/or western hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla) are dominant or co-dominant with Douglas-fir.
Other conifers include western larch (Larix occidentalis)
and western white pine (Pinus monticola) on mesic sites,
Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), lodgepole pine
(Pinus contorta), and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa)
on colder sites. Rarely, Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) may
be an abundant undergrowth tree or tall shrub.
Undergrowth vegetation varies from open to nearly closed shrub
thickets with one to many layers. Throughout the eastside conifer
habitat, tall deciduous shrubs include vine maple (Acer circinatum)
in the Cascades, Rocky Mountain maple (A. glabrum),
serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), oceanspray (Holodiscus
discolor), mallowleaf ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus),
and Scoulers willow (Salix scouleriana) at mid-
to lower elevations. Medium- tall deciduous shrubs at higher elevations
include fools huckleberry (Menziesia ferruginea), Cascade
azalea (Rhododendron albiflorum), and big huckleberry
(Vaccinium membranaceum). Widely distributed, generally drier
site mid-height to short deciduous shrubs include baldhip rose (Rosa
gymnocarpa), shiny-leaf spirea (Spiraea betulifolia),
and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus, S. mollis, and
S. oreophilus). Low shrubs of higher elevations include low
huckleberries (Vaccinium cespitosum, and V. scoparium)
and five-leaved bramble (Rubus pedatus). Evergreen shrubs
represented in this habitat are chinquapin (Castanopsis chrysophylla),
a tall shrub in southeastern Cascades, low to mid-height
dwarf Oregongrape (Mahonia nervosa in the east Cascades and
M. repens elsewhere), tobacco brush (Ceanothus velutinus),
an increaser with fire, Oregon boxwood (Paxistima myrsinites)
generally at mid- to lower elevations, beargrass (Xerophyllum tenax), pinemat manzanita (Arctostaphylos nevadensis) and kinnikinnick (A. uva-ursi).
Herbaceous
broadleaf plants are important indicators of site productivity and
disturbance. Species generally indicating productive sites include
western oakfern (Gymnocarpium dryopteris), vanillaleaf
(Achlys triphylla), wild sarsparilla (Aralia nudicaulis),
wild ginger (Asarum caudatum), queens cup (Clintonia
uniflora), goldthread (Coptis occidentalis), false bugbane
(Trautvetteria caroliniensis), windflower (Anemone oregana,
A. piperi, A. lyallii), fairybells (Disporum hookeri),
Sitka valerian (Valeriana sitchensis), and pioneer violet
(Viola glabella). Other indicator forbs are dogbane (Apocynum
androsaemifolium), false solomonseal (Maianthemum stellata),
heartleaf arnica (Arnica cordifolia), several lupines (Lupinus
caudatus, L. latifolius, L. argenteus ssp. argenteus var
laxiflorus), western meadowrue (Thalictrum occidentale),
rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera oblongifolia), skunkleaf polemonium
(Polemonium pulcherrimum), trailplant (Adenocaulon bicolor),
twinflower (Linnaea borealis), western starflower (Trientalis
latifolia), and several wintergreens (Pyrola asarifolia,
P. picta, Orthilia secunda).
Graminoids are common in this
forest habitat. Columbia brome (Bromus vulgaris), oniongrass (Melica
bulbosa), northwestern sedge (Carex concinnoides) and western fescue
(Festuca occidentalis) are found mostly in mesic forests with shrubs or
mixed with forb species. Bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata),
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), and junegrass (Koeleria
macrantha) are found in drier more open forests or woodlands. Pinegrass
(Calamagrostis rubescens) and Geyers sedge (C. geyeri) can
form a dense layer under Douglas-fir or grand fir trees.
Back to Top
Other
Classifications and Key References. This habitat includes the moist portions
of the Pseudotsuga menziesii, the Abies grandis, and the Tsuga
heterophylla zones of eastern Oregon and
Washington.88 This habitat is called Douglas- fir (No.
12), Cedar-Hemlock-Pine (No. 13), and Grand fir- Douglas-fir (No. 14) forests in
Kuchler.136 The Oregon Gap II
Project126 and Oregon Vegetation Landscape-Level Cover
Types127 that would represent this type are the
eastside Douglas-fir dominant-mixed conifer forest, ponderosa pine dominant
mixed conifer forest, and the northeast Oregon mixed conifer forest. Quigley and
Arbelbide181 referred to this habitat as Grand
fir/White fir, the Interior Douglas-fir, Western larch, Western redcedar/Western
hemlock, and Western white pine cover types and the Moist Forest potential
vegetation group. Other references detail forest associations for this
habitat.45, 59, 117, 118, 123, 122, 144, 148, 208, 209, 212, 221, 228
Natural Disturbance Regime. Fires were probably of moderate
frequency (30-100 years) in presettlement times. Inland Pacific
Northwest Douglas-fir and western larch forests have a mean fire
interval of 52 years.22 Typically, stand-replacement
fire-return intervals are 150-500 years with moderate severity-fire
intervals of 50-100 years. Specific fire influences vary with site
characteristics. Generally, wetter sites burn less frequently and
stands are older with more western hemlock and western redcedar
than drier sites. Many sites dominated by Douglas-fir and ponderosa
pine, which were formerly maintained by wildfire, may now be dominated
by grand fir (a fire sensitive, shade-tolerant species).
Succession and Stand Dynamics. Successional relationships of
this type reflect complex interrelationships between site potential, plant
species characteristics, and disturbance regime.228
Generally, early seral forests of shade-intolerant trees (western larch, western
white pine, ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir) or tolerant trees (grand fir, western
redcedar, western hemlock) develop some 50 years following disturbance. This
stage is preceded by forb- or shrub- dominated communities. These early stage
mosaics are maintained on ridges and drier topographic positions by frequent
fires. Early seral forest develops into mid-seral habitat of large trees during
the next 50-100 years. Stand replacing fires recycle this stage back to early
seral stages over most of the landscape. Without high- severity fires, a
late-seral condition develops either single- layer or multilayer structure
during the next 100-200 years. These structures are typical of cool bottomlands
that usually only experience low-intensity fires. Effects of
Management and Anthropogenic Impacts. This habitat has been most affected by
timber harvesting and fire suppression. Timber harvesting has focused on large
shade-intolerant species in mid- and late-seral forests, leaving shade-tolerant
species. Fire suppression enforces those logging priorities by promoting less
fire-resistant, shade-tolerant trees. The resultant stands at all seral stages
tend to lack snags, have high tree density, and are composed of smaller and more
shade-tolerant trees. Mid- seral forest structure is currently 70% more abundant
than in historical, native systems.181 Late-seral
forests of shade- intolerant species are now essentially absent. Early-seral
forest abundance is similar to that found historically but lacks snags and other
legacy features.
Status and Trends. Quigley and Arbelbide181
concluded that the Interior Douglas-fir, Grand fir, and Western
redcedar/Western hemlock cover types are more abundant now than
before 1900, whereas the Western larch and Western white pine types
are significantly less abundant. Twenty percent of Pacific Northwest
Douglas- fir, grand fir, western redcedar, western hemlock, and
western white pine associations listed in the National Vegetation
Classification are considered imperiled or critically imperiled.10
Roads, timber harvest, periodic grazing, and altered fire regimes
have compromised these forests. Even though this habitat is more
extensive than pre-1900, natural processes and functions have been
modified enough to alter its natural status as functional habitat
for many species.
Back to Top
|
|